A katpat goes to Michael Pinder, final year law undergraduate at the University of Liverpool and a man with a discerning eye. It is Michael who spotted that the IPKat got a mention in a recent UK IPO hearing, in Case O-067-13 Application of Ndinos Peri Peri Ltd; opposition of Nando's International Holdings Ltd, a decision of Al Skilton on 13 February.
"35. Exhibit GG5 is an article from the IPKat blog concerning these proceedings, dated 2 February 2012. Mr Gruber provides the following quotation: “The IPKat can't help but feel some sympathy for Nando's in this instance: he had to do a double-take when first reading about the dispute to assure himself that that "Ndinos‟ was not, in fact, a typo.”
36. Mr Gruber concludes that these extracts show that third parties regard the marks as confusingly similar".This Kat is naturally unsurprised that, relying on so unimpeachable an opinion, Ms Skilton could confidently uphold the opposition on the ground of confusing similarity. The original Katpost can be read here.
![]() |
| Ingrid: in the pink |
![]() |
| Something to be grumpy about? |





0 comments:
Post a Comment